Sonia is clear that this is not about shifting responsibility onto patients. It is about equipping them with the knowledge, skills and confidence to make informed decisions about their health.
“When people understand their condition and feel confident managing it, they use services differently,” Sonia explains. “They attend fewer unnecessary appointments, avoid emergency escalation and seek help earlier when something changes. This is undoubtedly better for patients, better for clinicians, and better for the sustainability of the system.”
Measuring engagement means measuring impact
“One of the most common questions I hear from health leaders is how do we know engagement is working?” Sonia says. Successful engagement should deliver clear, measurable benefits across three areas:
First, operational efficiency.
This includes reduced demand on administrative teams, fewer incoming phone calls, and lower costs associated with manual processes. It also means fewer paper letters, less duplication, and progress toward net-zero targets through digital communication.
Second, clinical impact.
When engagement is working, services see fewer unnecessary follow-up appointments, reduced demand for routine diagnostics, and more appropriate use of clinical time. Clinicians can focus on the people who need them most, rather than managing avoidable demand.
In short, clinicians should be able to prioritise time-to-care and the ability to risk-stratify patients, while commissioners focus on operational costs and efficiency.
Third, patient confidence.
This is perhaps the most important measure of all. Do people understand their condition? Do they feel capable of managing it? Do they know what to do if their symptoms change?
If the answer to those questions is yes, then engagement is working.
- 95% have a better understanding of their conditions
- 91% feel more confident about managing their condition
- 88% feel more confident about what to do if their condition gets worse